GHSH supports public institutions at every stage of digital transformation — from needs assessment and gap mapping, through the development of a detailed action plan, to pilot deployments and scaling proven solutions. Our approach is based on the assessment → roadmap → pilot → scale methodology, which ensures measurable results and minimizes operational risk for the public sector.
The case studies below illustrate the scope and nature of projects carried out by GHSH with government partners in various regions. Cards marked as "example" serve as a template library of project structures — they reflect real types of engagement without disclosing sensitive client data.
GHSH's four-phase model provides a structured approach to every implementation — from the first institutional assessment to full-scale operational scaling of the solution in a government environment.
Each project card includes key contextual information: region, thematic area, type of engagement, and a concise summary of results. The library is updated regularly as ongoing initiatives progress.
Region: Central Europe (example)
Area: Medical data interoperability
Assessment of data exchange readiness between hospitals and central institutions. Development of a target architecture aligned with HL7 FHIR and eIDAS standards.
Region: East Africa (example)
Area: Health system financing
Comprehensive assessment of health financing mechanisms, with particular emphasis on universal health coverage (UHC) and external funds.
Region: Southeast Asia (example)
Area: Digital transformation of the health sector
Development of a 5-year digitalization roadmap for ministries of health, covering data infrastructure, telemedicine, and e-Health systems.
Region: Western Europe (example)
Area: Resilience and business continuity
Scaling a pilot crisis data management system at the national level — implementing failover and redundancy protocols for critical health infrastructure.
Region: Latin America (example)
Area: Access and equity in health care
Piloting a telemedicine model for communities far from stationary facilities — integration with the national patient registry system and mobile diagnostic units.
Region: Middle East (example)
Area: Supply chain management
Roadmap for digitalizing public procurement of medical products — regulatory gap analysis, system recommendations, and e-procurement platform specifications for the ministry of health.
Use the filters to quickly find projects that match your needs. The library allows filtering by key parameters:
Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin America, Middle East
Interoperability, financing, access, resilience, digitalization
Assessment / Roadmap / Pilot / Scale
Planned / In progress / Completed
The GHSH project library was designed as a working tool for decision-makers and public project managers. The project cards contain structured information enabling a quick assessment of the relevance of a given case study to one’s own institutional context.
Each project is described according to a consistent schema: region, subject area, type of engagement, implementation phase, and a concise description of results. Sensitive data are aggregated in accordance with confidentiality rules — we share only information that government partners have approved for publication.
GHSH project credibility is built on a rigorous methodology for measuring results. Every engagement is designed with measurable outcomes in mind—defined jointly with the government partner at the assessment stage and monitored throughout the project lifecycle. We apply a five-dimensional KPI framework that includes both quantitative and qualitative indicators.
Service reach, number of beneficiaries served, and reduction of geographic and financial barriers to healthcare access.
Standards of service delivery, clinical compliance indicators, patient satisfaction, and adherence to care protocols.
Cost-effectiveness of interventions, optimization of public spending, and the ratio of inputs to achieved health outcomes.
Level of system integration, ability to exchange data between institutions, and compliance with national and European standards.
The system's ability to maintain continuity during crises, recovery time, and redundancy of critical processes.
GHSH applies rigorous reporting standards that protect the interests of government partners and patients while ensuring methodological transparency. Data is presented only in aggregated form—never as information that could identify specific institutions or individuals.
Before any results are published, each government partner receives a draft report for approval. Results are categorized according to a uniform taxonomy of engagement types (Assessment / Roadmap / Pilot / Scale), which makes it possible to compare projects with similar profiles without compromising confidentiality.
Results presented as trends and ranges, not individual values
Every publication requires formal approval from the government institution
Countries and regions identified descriptively, not by name
Government decision-makers need evidence, not promises. Structured impact measurement frameworks make it possible to:
Every healthcare system is different—different institutional structures, regulatory environments, levels of digital readiness, and access to funding. That is why GHSH does not offer ready-made templates, but rather a tailored methodological approach grounded in the realities of a specific partner.
The first step is always a free diagnostic briefing—a conversation that helps identify key challenges, assess the institutional context, and propose the right type of engagement. No obligations, with concrete value for your organization already at the initial conversation stage.
Assessment, Roadmap, Pilot, Scale
Access, quality, costs, interoperability, resilience
Europe, Africa, Asia, the Americas, the Middle East
Projects and Case Studies